Last week
I started an experiment using instant messaging. I thank the
many of you who sent me IMs, a great way for me to meet you, the
readers of this weblog. I plan to keep trying IM for a while but I
have had learned a few lessons which seem obvious in retrospect.
Instant messaging can be a time sink. I love communicating with
people, which is the main reason I keep this weblog going. However, as
most academics, I have much going on and can't afford to have many
lengthy discussions. I've also learned there is no clean way to end an
IM conversation. So please feel free to IM me but don't take it
personally if I rudely keep the conversation short.
Just because the nice icon on the home page says I'm online it doesn't
mean that I am at my computer and available to chat at the
moment. Often I am and I will but if not I will eventually see your
message and respond. If there is really is something important that
you want to discuss with me via IM we can setup a scheduled time via
email. I often do this with phone calls so why not IM too?
I've also discovered IM conversations can be recorded, posted on the
web and could be used in a court of law. I need to be
careful about what I say.
I have already had some interesting research conversations and ideas
for weblog posts via IM. The
last post came in part because of some IM
questions about the Feigenbaum-Fortnow paper. Email became a powerful
research tool when email use hit a critical mass among computer
scientists sometime in the mid-late 80's. I believe IM will also follow that
curve and I hope to keep ahead of it and perhaps nudge it a little
bit.