A quantum computing graduate student sent me email over the
weekend. He had thought he had proven some surprising results about the
class PP and was wondering if he was making some mistake. After some
discussion here was his reply:
Ok I get it. Somehow I jumped to the conclusion that PPP
was PP. There is one more for your blog: A⊆ B implies B⊆
AB but not AB⊆ B (duh!)
He goes on
to say he made his quantum leap to conclusions since for the quantum
class BQP, PBQP=BQP, he thought the same property must hold
for all classes.
I present this because he suggested it for my weblog and as a public
service for those who might make a similar mistake. Yes, in case you
were wondering, for reasonable classes A (like A=P), B⊆AB without
needing to assume A⊆B.