For more information on Steve Mahaney's untimely demise
see
here and here is how you can contribute to help honor his memory.
Mahaney's theorem is
If there is a set S that is both sparse and NP complete
then P=NP
Lance has already done a nice blog entry
on this topic, so I will take this in a different direction.
I looked in Joel Seifras's theroy database for theory articles
with the word `sparse' in them. I then edited it down to
articles that relate directly or indirectly to
Mahaney's theorem. While this is hard to make
precise, there were over 100 articles that owe a
debt of gratitude to Mahaney's papers
(I do not know how many of them cited Mahaney's
paper.)
I list the articles that seem most directly related
to Mahaney's paper. I may have left out papers that
ended up being superseded by papers on this list.
If there is a sparse S that is NP-complete then P=NP.
Sparse Complete Sets for NP: Solution of a Conjecture of Berman and Hartmanis, by Mahaney.
1982 JCSS, Vol 25.
(earlier version in FOCS 1980, 25th FOCS)
If there is a sparse S that is NP-hard under btt-reductions then P=NP.
On Polynomial-Time Bounded Truth-Table Reducibility of NP Sets to Sparse Sets, SICOMP 1991, V. 20 by Ogiwara and Watanabe
(earlier version in STOC 1990, 22 STOC)
An easier proof of Ogiwara-Watnabe paper with better bounds:
On Reductions of NP Sets to Sparse Sets by Homer and Longpre.
JCSS 1994, V. 48
(Earlier version in COMPLEXITY 1991)
Generalize to counting classes. For example, if there is
a set that is btt-hard for MOD2P then MOD2P=P
On Sparse Hard Sets for Counting Classes.
by Ogiwara and Lozano, TCS 1993, V. 112.
If there is a sparse set that is NP-hard under Turing reductions
then PH=\Sigma2pSome Connections Between Nonuniform and Uniform Complexity
Classes, by Karp and Lipton, STOC 1982
If there is a sparse set that is NP-hard under Turing reductions then
PH collapse further. (Complicated to state exactly how much further).
Competing Provers Yield Improved Karp-Lipton Collapse Results,
by Cai and Chakaravarthy and Hemaspaandra and Ogihara,
INFCTRL, 2005, V. 198
If there is a sparse set complete for P under log-space many-one reductions
then P=L.
Sparse Hard Sets for P:
Resolution of a Conjecture of Hartmanis,
by Cai and Sivakumar,
JCSS 1999, V. 58. (Earlier version in COCOON 1997)
Joel Seifras theory database is one line for every paper EVERY published in theory. goto
ftp://www.cs.rochester.edu/pub/u/joel
ALSO- anoymous 3, your link to a post that my blog entry also links to when I refer to Lance's post on sparse sets. I checked my link and it was fine- so why is your comment a link to it?