Why do I remain on the editorial board of the Elsevier journal
Information and Computation? Partly as loyalty to Albert Meyer,
the long time editor-in-chief, who gave me my first major editorial
position. But also because I believe that one can change some of the
policies in Elsevier by talking to Elsevier instead of just boycotting
them. And we've made some small progress. Elsevier papers are being
(slowly) added to search sites like Google Scholar. And Elsevier
recently announced a theoretical
computer science student
package, electronic access to a dozen theory-related journal for
$50/year. Likely too little too late in reducing the bad will Elsevier has
developed in recent years.
Among the dozen is the oddly-named Journal
of Algorithms in Cognition, Informatics and Logic, a sort-of
resurrection of the Journal of Algorithms whose editorial board
resigned at
the end of 2003. Given the new title, a manifesto
and aims,
the journal has moved mostly away from tradtional TCS algorithms for a
more logic and AI focus. Hal Gabow tells more including
how, without their knowledge, many people from our community,
including some previous Journal of Algorithms editors, were mentioned
as supposedly connected to this new incarnation.
A similar story happened with the Journal of Logic Programming whose
editorial board had resigned
in 1999 and whose journal was remade as the Journal of Logic and
Algebraic Programming.
The last issue of J. Alg was volume 62 number 2. The first issue of
JACIL is volume 62 number 3, so JACIL is officially just a
continuation of the Journal of Algorithms. Given the vastly different
editorial focus, why not just start it as a new journal? Partly to
take advantage of the reputation of the former journal, but also to protect the
back catalog, the valuable assets that Elsevier has in the many
important papers that have years ago appeared in J. Alg and the other
Elsevier theory journals.
But even for the theory journals that remain at Elsevier, like TCS,
JCSS and I&C, one cannot help but notice an overall decline in
the quality and quantity of the articles appearing over the last
couple of years. One would hope that those missing strong papers are
being sent to journals like Theory of Computing and the ACM
Transactions on Algorithms and
Computation Theory and a few
have. But the controversies over journals are causing even greater
numbers of authors in theory and throughout computer science not to
bother writing journal versions of their conference papers. The main
complaints about Elsevier relate to access, but no paper is less
accessible than the paper not written.
Who came up with this original idea? Maybe I am missing something basic here, but for students in most/bigger universities this deal is not necessary, and for others it is probably too expensive anyway.