KKMD (comment 3) is correct, it is the largest prime that divides n.
The formal proof is
here.
pi: I originally used an & followed by pi which yields &pi
pi: I was supposed to use & followed by pi and then a semicolon which yields π
pi: Lance says to use
< span style=" font-family:times" > & pi;</span> which yields
π
Some of the comments from the posting on
ith largest of n inspire some random
thoughts from me:
Why on earth would anyone be doing a computer search for
such algorithms? (for algorithms to find ith largest of n with
as few comparisons as possible).
One hope is that with enough empiricial evidence we may
get EXACT values for how many comparisons it takes.
Also, for the challenge! But YES, limited practical value.
But see next point.
Why do you think your conjecture is true?
The known algorithms for finding ith largest of n take
n+(i-1)log n + O(1) and begin by making comparisons pairwise.
For i small this is optimal up to the O(1). So in this realm
it seems likely. But what is `i small'? When finding the 10th largest
out of 40 is that more like i small or like you are finding
the n/4th largest element? Don't know- want to find out.
Another reason to do this- when is small small?
A commenter says there is interesting info in a Tech Report
that may be hard to find. The notion of a Tech Report
that is hard to find may be unfamiliar to young people.
With the web
it may be easier to find some unpublished papers
then some published ones, depending on who the authors are
and the journals are.
(If someone knows where the Journal version of Barrington's paper
on Bounded Width BP containing NC1 is online please
let me know. Barrington does not have it on his website
or know where it is online.)
Lance recently recommended a certain wallet in
this blog.
On his advice I bought it and its great. What I wonder is,
how big a mover and shaker is Lance? Should they have given
him a free wallet since he influences others? How many others
have bought it based on his recommendation?
At
Maryland Theory Day
there was a talk about
how sellers should give people of influence
discounts since they will influence others to buy their
product. This is not a new idea, but with modern technology
it can be better targeted.
I can access the full journal version of Barrington's paper on ScienceDirect through my university's subscription. Ask your university to get better subscription access... Unfortunately, not all scientific articles are freely available (yet).
I want to POST it on my course website. Hard to do with a FAX. If someone has an e-copy it should be easy to email me the pdf file or whatever format it is in.
Most computer scientists that I know (1) post their papers to their websites, and (2) have never gotten a cease and desist order of anything of the sort. Same with websites dedicated to various topics (so NOT the website owners papers)
So while you may be right about the legal status, you are wrong about ``thats how we've all been publishing'' In fact I know of very few people who do not post their papers to their website. Unfortunately, Barrington is one of them.
Not to be pedantic, but isn't it true that an author is not typically allowed to post the journal's version (as it appears in the final publication with the journal's name and formatting, etc.) on his/her website but is allowed to post his/her own version (a preprint, for example)? Of course, it would depend on the journal and what its copyright statement says.
I bought a wallet too. I was getting annoyed after a few weeks that no package had arrived. Then I finally looked through the envelopes stacked up in my in slot. Of course, it had been there for several weeks. Doh! If it's the world's thinnest wallet, it don't need no stinkin' package! I've been carrying for several weeks now. It is a lot easier on my gluts. A little hard getting cash in and out because it is not very stiff. I also wonder if my credit cards will get bent out of shape from sitting on them. But better them than me. Overall, a thumb's up though.